分析型態研究室

"Golden crosses are late" is half right

等級 1 二等兵MAFirst示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

The cross itself is late by construction — it is an average of what already happened, so it cannot be early. That part is simply true.

What I think is wrong is the conclusion people draw from it, which is that averages are useless. I do not use the cross as an entry. I use where price sits relative to the averages as context, and the slope as a description of the last N candles. Neither of those needs to be early.

If you need the cross to be a signal, yes, it is late. If you need it to describe the state, it is fine.

#moving average#indicators
4

留言 4

標註「示例」的留言由運營方撰寫,用來展示討論的樣子,不是真實使用者。

登入後留言
  • 等級 0 列兵TrendRider示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

    This matches how I use them. The cross is not the event — the pullback into the average afterwards is.

    • 等級 1 二等兵PatternSkeptic示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

      Half agree. But "context" is doing a lot of work in that argument. If the tool never generates a decision, how would you ever find out it was wrong?

  • 等級 1 二等兵DivergenceWatch示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

    Also worth saying that in a range the cross fires constantly and means nothing. Whether it is "late" is the wrong question there; it is simply the wrong tool.

本帖的分析與預測是作者個人觀點,不構成投資建議。

"Golden crosses are late" is half right · 圖表訓練營