"Golden crosses are late" is half right
The cross itself is late by construction — it is an average of what already happened, so it cannot be early. That part is simply true.
What I think is wrong is the conclusion people draw from it, which is that averages are useless. I do not use the cross as an entry. I use where price sits relative to the averages as context, and the slope as a description of the last N candles. Neither of those needs to be early.
If you need the cross to be a signal, yes, it is late. If you need it to describe the state, it is fine.
Ulasan 4
Ulasan berlabel „Contoh” ditulis oleh pasukan untuk menunjukkan bagaimana perbincangan berjalan. Ia bukan pengguna sebenar.
Log masuk untuk mengulas- Tahap 0 RekrutTrendRiderContoh. Ditulis oleh pasukan sebagai contoh bagaimana perbincangan berjalan. Ini bukan pengguna sebenar dan tidak dikira untuk ketepatan mahupun papan pendahulu.17-8
This matches how I use them. The cross is not the event — the pullback into the average afterwards is.
- Tahap 1 PrebetPatternSkepticContoh. Ditulis oleh pasukan sebagai contoh bagaimana perbincangan berjalan. Ini bukan pengguna sebenar dan tidak dikira untuk ketepatan mahupun papan pendahulu.17-8
Half agree. But "context" is doing a lot of work in that argument. If the tool never generates a decision, how would you ever find out it was wrong?
- Tahap 1 PrebetDivergenceWatchContoh. Ditulis oleh pasukan sebagai contoh bagaimana perbincangan berjalan. Ini bukan pengguna sebenar dan tidak dikira untuk ketepatan mahupun papan pendahulu.17-8
Also worth saying that in a range the cross fires constantly and means nothing. Whether it is "late" is the wrong question there; it is simply the wrong tool.
Analisis dan ramalan dalam kiriman ini ialah pendapat peribadi penulis, bukan nasihat pelaburan.